Discussion:
[ITK-users] ITK is more general than medical imaging!
Nathan Lay
2018-07-07 00:18:01 UTC
Permalink
Just personal observation... but I've been using ITK in a very similar
fashion to medical imaging to do some cartography/geography related work
(my spacing is m instead of mm). And saving extra/custom meta data like
GeoTIFF is something the medical imaging community has been doing for
decades with a plethora of formats (like MetaIO and DICOM). I can also
imagine streaming IO being useful for streaming large sections of the earth
too! It's also really useful to save 16 bit pixels sometimes... and
visualize them (and overlay them on other images or masks).

Why is ITK only a medical imaging toolkit again? A big reason I use ITK for
such *unrelated* work is that its itk::Image carries transformations
around. And that information (and more!) get saved to file too.

I mean doing similar work with PNG/JPG and OpenCV is a nightmare by
comparison when you need to work with lots of different coordinate systems
simultaneously.

Best regards,
Nathan Lay
Dženan Zukić
2018-07-07 23:36:00 UTC
Permalink
Hi Nathan,

ITK is NOT only a medical imaging toolkit. It has many other uses. You are
right that it has primarily medical focus, and that is because it has been
primarily funded by NIH.

Thanks for positive feedback. Also, you might want to join the new forum
<https://discourse.itk.org/>.

Regards,
DÅŸenan
Post by Nathan Lay
Just personal observation... but I've been using ITK in a very similar
fashion to medical imaging to do some cartography/geography related work
(my spacing is m instead of mm). And saving extra/custom meta data like
GeoTIFF is something the medical imaging community has been doing for
decades with a plethora of formats (like MetaIO and DICOM). I can also
imagine streaming IO being useful for streaming large sections of the earth
too! It's also really useful to save 16 bit pixels sometimes... and
visualize them (and overlay them on other images or masks).
Why is ITK only a medical imaging toolkit again? A big reason I use ITK
for such *unrelated* work is that its itk::Image carries transformations
around. And that information (and more!) get saved to file too.
I mean doing similar work with PNG/JPG and OpenCV is a nightmare by
comparison when you need to work with lots of different coordinate systems
simultaneously.
Best regards,
Nathan Lay
The ITK community is transitioning from this mailing list to
discourse.itk.org. Please join us there!
________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
https://itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
Matt McCormick
2018-07-09 14:55:17 UTC
Permalink
Hi Nathan,

Yes, ITK's capability for spatial analysis and its general
functionality has a lot to offer many domains. We need your help to
spread the word :-).

Regarding satellite imagery, the ITK-based OrfeoToolbox (OTB) has a
lot to offer also:

https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/

Cheers,
Matt
Post by Dženan Zukić
Hi Nathan,
ITK is NOT only a medical imaging toolkit. It has many other uses. You are right that it has primarily medical focus, and that is because it has been primarily funded by NIH.
Thanks for positive feedback. Also, you might want to join the new forum.
Regards,
Dženan
Just personal observation... but I've been using ITK in a very similar fashion to medical imaging to do some cartography/geography related work (my spacing is m instead of mm). And saving extra/custom meta data like GeoTIFF is something the medical imaging community has been doing for decades with a plethora of formats (like MetaIO and DICOM). I can also imagine streaming IO being useful for streaming large sections of the earth too! It's also really useful to save 16 bit pixels sometimes... and visualize them (and overlay them on other images or masks).
Why is ITK only a medical imaging toolkit again? A big reason I use ITK for such *unrelated* work is that its itk::Image carries transformations around. And that information (and more!) get saved to file too.
I mean doing similar work with PNG/JPG and OpenCV is a nightmare by comparison when you need to work with lots of different coordinate systems simultaneously.
Best regards,
Nathan Lay
The ITK community is transitioning from this mailing list to discourse.itk.org. Please join us there!
________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
https://itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
The ITK community is transitioning from this mailing list to discourse.itk.org. Please join us there!
________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
https://itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
The ITK community is transitioning from this mailing list to discourse.itk.org. Please join us there!
________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://itk.org/mailman/list

Loading...